Marriage and parenthood for all now! - Paperblog
"It is a matter of company", "we have other far more pressing problems to deal with," they say. And I'm not talking about those for whom "the debate must take place first," for whom "we do not have enough experience." And I do not even mention the arguments of those who would like the Republic adopts laws conform to a particular religious dogma. internet censorship bill passed They do deserve our contempt.
Equal rights is an imperative Republican. And allow homosexuals to be parents as others is also a social emergency.
Marriage first. Certainly, being able to marry is not vital. PACS opens up many rights and could even bring these two institutions. Some would even make the same while maintaining different names. Those are the worst hypocrites. For others, marriage is a bourgeois institution. I agree, but it does not justify the status quo.
We need to open marriage to all couples. internet censorship bill passed We have no choice. Or is it that we have given equal rights. Because that is what he is: a legal discrimination. Revolution decriminalized sodomy in 1791. France was far ahead at the time. But Petain returned to this extent internet censorship bill passed and new repressive laws were adopted under De Gaulle. It was not until 1982 that decriminalized homosexual relations is complete. Until then, have sex with a person of the same sex more than 15 years was still a crime. This may seem insignificant. It is not. Not only because people have been sentenced to prison on the basis of this law, but also because the difference of "age internet censorship bill passed of consent" helped fuel a mix between homosexuality and pedophilia (like use the term " fag ").
I also had an instance a few days ago. A colleague, who is far from being homophobic, I was told that Charles Trenet "loved little children," that it was "known". Astonished, I made a little research and discovered that he had, in 1963, was briefly detained, dragged through the mud and sentenced to suspended, internet censorship bill passed for allegedly (he deny) had sex with two men 20 years. He received a call but not in place, 50 years later, rumors of his pedophilia is still circulating.
In 1990, a parliamentary left wing of the PS, recently made aware of the cause of homosexual persons, filed a first bill to create a partnership or civil union and helps initiate the debate (I forgot it ' was him. I must say that it made me warm heart). 9 years later the PCS adopted. At the time, it was an important step towards equality. In 2006, rather than following the path opened by the Dutch, Belgians, Spaniards and Canadians, France simply to improve the law on the PACS.
We now need to complete this work. And let no one tell me that some couples do not want to get married ... NO Even same-sex couple internet censorship bill passed does not want to marry, he would still fight for ALL they have the right. Women who do not vote are they willing to waive the right to vote?
Of course, the issue of parenting for all touch the same republican principles. But as the question of marriage could be considered symbolic one, as that of parenthood has real consequences on the lives of thousands of families. Because yes, the children raised by same-sex couples exist. And they are many. I could find numbers of sites associative but I doubt we can give them any credit because in this country we do recens
"It is a matter of company", "we have other far more pressing problems to deal with," they say. And I'm not talking about those for whom "the debate must take place first," for whom "we do not have enough experience." And I do not even mention the arguments of those who would like the Republic adopts laws conform to a particular religious dogma. internet censorship bill passed They do deserve our contempt.
Equal rights is an imperative Republican. And allow homosexuals to be parents as others is also a social emergency.
Marriage first. Certainly, being able to marry is not vital. PACS opens up many rights and could even bring these two institutions. Some would even make the same while maintaining different names. Those are the worst hypocrites. For others, marriage is a bourgeois institution. I agree, but it does not justify the status quo.
We need to open marriage to all couples. internet censorship bill passed We have no choice. Or is it that we have given equal rights. Because that is what he is: a legal discrimination. Revolution decriminalized sodomy in 1791. France was far ahead at the time. But Petain returned to this extent internet censorship bill passed and new repressive laws were adopted under De Gaulle. It was not until 1982 that decriminalized homosexual relations is complete. Until then, have sex with a person of the same sex more than 15 years was still a crime. This may seem insignificant. It is not. Not only because people have been sentenced to prison on the basis of this law, but also because the difference of "age internet censorship bill passed of consent" helped fuel a mix between homosexuality and pedophilia (like use the term " fag ").
I also had an instance a few days ago. A colleague, who is far from being homophobic, I was told that Charles Trenet "loved little children," that it was "known". Astonished, I made a little research and discovered that he had, in 1963, was briefly detained, dragged through the mud and sentenced to suspended, internet censorship bill passed for allegedly (he deny) had sex with two men 20 years. He received a call but not in place, 50 years later, rumors of his pedophilia is still circulating.
In 1990, a parliamentary left wing of the PS, recently made aware of the cause of homosexual persons, filed a first bill to create a partnership or civil union and helps initiate the debate (I forgot it ' was him. I must say that it made me warm heart). 9 years later the PCS adopted. At the time, it was an important step towards equality. In 2006, rather than following the path opened by the Dutch, Belgians, Spaniards and Canadians, France simply to improve the law on the PACS.
We now need to complete this work. And let no one tell me that some couples do not want to get married ... NO Even same-sex couple internet censorship bill passed does not want to marry, he would still fight for ALL they have the right. Women who do not vote are they willing to waive the right to vote?
Of course, the issue of parenting for all touch the same republican principles. But as the question of marriage could be considered symbolic one, as that of parenthood has real consequences on the lives of thousands of families. Because yes, the children raised by same-sex couples exist. And they are many. I could find numbers of sites associative but I doubt we can give them any credit because in this country we do recens
No comments:
Post a Comment